How Important are Religious Views of Supreme Court Judges
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLVHA2dWGoMLhtpmHFm4vYWNOt5ndjUq6ee6rscQg9PBo7c59nD-aAdQt0kbg_d1Lx8RERhKIkn8fpBd_3yd4eDB-J73JEeLfUcYDhgWjtM5i909g193grLXWLTbI3XqrXF98UN1txCgA/s320/Supreme+Court+Justices.jpg)
Some liberal people in Congress have asked pointed questions about the religious views of potential Federal Court appointees. They are roundly criticized for asking these questions by conservatives. There is a need, however, to try to get into the heads of these candidates. Their religious views are not as important as whether they know the difference between reality and religious fantasy. I'm not a legal scholar but I like it where the link points out our laws should be based on reality. To base them on dead people coming back to life or one fertilized cell is a human being is foreign to a modern country. We might expect that dreams and visions were mixed up with reality in the middle ages but there should be enough rationality in the head of a potential Supreme Court nominee to see that dreams or invisible gods are not reality. I've heard that the current Trump nominee facies herself as a second Justice Scalia. In 2013 Justice Scalia was asked by a journalist if he believed ...