A Split Over "Religious Freedom" Was Inevitable



The Rutherford Institute in an old name in political and legal disputes. It's former leader claims it was established to defend the rights of all religious people in all religions. He now says he disapproves of Rutherford's current work to defend only right-wing Christianity and right-wing political causes. One should not allow the camel's nose to get under the tent.

Back when it started, Rutherford defended all religions. Today, we know, right-wing groups defend only Christianity and demonize other religions. If you would like the freedom to be a Muslim, don't depend on Rutherford for help. You are on your own.

The ignorance of religious groups, be it anti-abortion, anti-gay or anti Muslim, is astounding. It's leaders cannot understand they need allies. The fewer the allies and the more enemies the lower the changes for success.

Right wing religion, Catholic or Southern Baptist, would have more members if they embraced gay people and women who have had or need abortions. Current hater-members would be angry, but they have no place to go.

We need only look at today's polling numbers. Trump is not doing well. If right-wing Christians had been smarter they would not have burned their relationship with Democrats. Now, both Democrats and Republicans are moving on without them.

As society moves to accept abortion and gay/trans the hatred part of the political spectrum becomes more isolated. This has had some setbacks and twists and turns, but the direction of tolerance is unmistakable. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Will We Ever Know How Accurate Current Bibles Are

Talarico Looks Like an Obama II

Time to Forget the Christian Nation Thing