Which Myths are Most Accurate? Written in Stone or Verbal History
In Peru is a statue carved in stone. It is engraved with a text which says that particular location was, or remains, the center of the universe. In the Bible we have the Garden of Eden, thought to be in today's Iran. The Bible says that is where history began, i,e, center of the universe. The statue in Peru and the story in the Bible date to about the same time, some years BCE. Which is "the truth?"
The term "written in stone" indicates power and longevity. Unfortunately, the god of the stone did not last forever and, like all the other gods, is lost in the sands of time. It could well be that god lasted longer than our current on in Christianity will last. It exists due to oral history and what sins that god condemns changes regularly. It could be that if Christians had written the Bible on stones instead of on pieces of papyrus that are long gone the faith would not continue to change.
The wealthy Green family of Hobby Lobby funded the Museum of the Bible. I assume they thought, and still believe, having old Bibles "proves" something. The stone in Peru is a better "museum" than anything the Greens can buy. If the Greens were honest historians they would display a replica of the Peru stone and admit societies all over the world had gods and religions at the same time Christians had theirs.
Comments
Post a Comment