"Christian Archeology" Keeps Claiming it has "Found" Something
The newest fragments claim to be remnants of a battle mentioned in the Bible. In this case, and most all others I know about, some pieces of pottery, etc., have been found that are linked to the ethnic group involved in the Bible story. The objects found are not linked to the battle itself and could have been left by others living or passing through the area.
Humorous examples of "finds" that attempted to verify Old Testament stories included the "Walls of Jericho." Remints of stone walls were found and celebrated. Then they were dated and could not have been the "Walls of Jericho." Then there was for costly search for evidence that Moses lived in the desert for 40 years. This search was paid for by the government of Israel. Nothing found there either. The stories live on, but they did not happen.
So often I see highway billboards advertising a church. The billboard declares, "We are a Bible Believing Church." If there are things in the Bible that no rational person can believe, why do churches make this claim? Wouldn't it be safer to claim, "We are a Bible-reading church"? Of course, no church reads the parts of the Bible that borders on porn. So, an even safer claim would be, "We read selected parts of the Bible."
It seems to me a career that is safe from unemployment is to be a "Christain Archologist." As long as you continue digging in areas where stuff is found from about 5,000 years BCE to the first 100 years you can get funding from Christian organizations by claiming what you found "could confirm the account...(fill in a Bible story." Christian Archeology looks like a growth industry.
Comments
Post a Comment