Do Trump and His Circle Have Any Sense of Overreach
Trump firring federal employees and attempting to best every other national leader must be exhilarating for him. One wonders if there is ever a voice of doubt or caution in his mind or on the lips of anyone he talks to?
Everyone who has had a course or reads in the field of world history knows of the fallen empires. It seems military victories and I suppose other kinds of victories is an intoxication that is never satisfied. Among the many hours of discussion on television and publications everywhere is the small voice of caution. History seems to say a fall in inevitable.
Hitler's Germany and the Soviet Union are examples of empires in more recent history. To an amateur observer like myself their eventual fails were not unlike the Roman empire and others. They grew and took on more than they could control. They simply overreached.
It is seldom brought up, but Senator Kent Conrad of North Dakota voted against invading Iraq. Afterwards he said he was concerned about overreach in history. What a mistake George W. Bush made by claiming "weapons or mass destruction" existed convinced enough in the Capital to invade.
While most of historical overreach involved military conquests, Trump does not instinctively go to military projects. That has been the case so far. It does not guarantee he will not get a taste for it later.
Overreach can also happen with trade and the other projects now in play.
Comments
Post a Comment