California: Abandoned Churches Mean More Low Income Housing
Leave it to California to come up with new ideas. California, its budget, population and land mass is larger than many countries. It has its share, or maybe more than its share, of churches that are closing. Like everywhere else, schools also are closing as family size declines. It has another huge problem well known across the U.S., homeless people. Homelessness and empty churches/schools are being combined to solve both problems.
A new law allows a "fast track" to build housing on any site where a church or school now stands. Only people who have been close to the process for approve of a building of any kind in a city, especially California, understands what this "short cut to approval" means.
All of this goes back centuries to the beginning of zoning and building codes. Zoning was put in place in many places in the world to regulate what can be built next to your home. Building codes are for safety from hazards and fires (the fire codes are separate from the building codes). Codes today include lots of space for parking. To put up a building requires months, sometimes years, of bureaucratic steps and public meetings.
An apartment building in California now costs over $400,000 per apartment. That is the big reason there are so many homeless people. The "fast track" eliminates many of the approve steps and should save at least $10,000 per apartment. If several other steps and requirements were backed down it seems like the savings would be several times that amount.
There are so many parts to the puzzle of housing costs. Another one not discussed in the California fast track law is parking spaces and the width of streets near the house or housing building. All of this concrete and asphalt is for convenience and pleasure, not for safety. Cutting back on these will lower costs while raising complaints.
There will be angry neighbors when churches and schools are fast tracked to apartments. A growing population and rural to urban migration make it inevitable we will have to tolerate neighborhoods we wish were different than they are. I live in a downtown condo building with a low-income apartment building next door. Our windows face that building with its frequent police car sirens and noisy fights. I don't complain. We all need to live somewhere.
Kudos to California for the first step in cutting red tape and building more housing.
Comments
Post a Comment