Allowing Abortions Only "To Save the Life of the Mother" Don't Save Her


What exactly does a law mean which allows an abortion when it is necessary to "save the life of the mother?" Is it why the probability of life loss is 5%, 50% or 100%? The laws never say.  There are records of women are dying in Catholic Hospitals and its coming in anti-abortion states. The death of a woman in Ireland was the driving force that won a national referendum to legalize abortions.  

We had two pregnancies in our family the past two years. I advised both mothers not to give birth in a Catholic hospital. Thankfully, neither did.

The notion a dead fetus cannot be removed until the nerves called "heartbeat" stop firing is both dangerous to the mother and absurd. It not a decision most women would make for themselves. Men, however, making decisions as clergy or legislators have no second thought about this barbaric reasoning. 

The link, written by an anti-abortion attorney, says We cannot write laws that incentivize doctors to err on the side of allowing the woman to die and ignore the outcome that will result.

The problem with this common sense is that a large share of the anti-abortion community does not consider the unnecessary death of women to be important. A dead fetus not removed immediately represents a victory in their minds. 

It doesn't seem that difficult to write laws favoring the life of the mother. When there is a greater than average risk and the woman wants an abortion the self-evident conclusion is she should have one.

This highlights again the competitive nature of a pregnancy. The fetus can kill the mother. The mother should be in on the calculations about how risky a pregnancy is for her.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe the "Original Sin" Should be Reassigned

Image
We can all agree most Catholic priests are fine people and not guilty of sexual abuse. What Catholics must face, however, it that their church harbors executives who are dishonest . There is an incredible story about the Argentine Bishop Zanchetta. The Pope worked with him in Argentina and they are considered friends. Around 2015 Zanchetta sent nude pictures of himself and they began circulating world wide. He also was too friendly with young seminarians and some left because of him.  Three different officials say they made formal complaints to the Vatican about Zanchetta between 2015 and 2017. Yet, in 2018, the Vatican claimed it was unaware of any complaints about Zanchetta. This might be a good time to repeat the Catholic hierarchy claims to have the sole authority handed down from Jesus to what the faith stands for. It condemns as sinners those who practice birth control, have abortions and gay sexual relationships. Handing the hierarchy this responsibility would make som
Read more

The Religious Capitol Invaders May Yet Win

Image
So much about U.S. society and religion can be learned from the Civil War and what happened afterwards. After its defeat, the South started a myth about the unethical soldiers from the North. The South fought for principles of God and states rights. The North did not. It was the South, this propaganda told the country, that had the high moral ground.  The Capitol invaders, encouraged by Trump, swallowed the myth that Biden's election was stolen. Thus, they think they held and still hold the high moral ground. This was reinforced by the cross and prayers during the invasion. Even with Trump is gone, we will see political opportunists like Senators Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley stroking crowds and feeding the same lies as Trump. Like "the South will rise again" these gullible followers will talk of victory over the unclean. After the Civil War the South rallied around the phrase, Lost Cause. For decades, and maybe to this day, there are ceremonies remembering fallen martyrs, Re
Read more

Father Frank Pavone, the Ultimate Crook

Image
Recently, the Vatican defrocked Frank Pavone. His diehard fans are outraged. This is because he cleverly manipulated his fans and the press all the while living well from donations and, apparently, abusing some women. By making abortion the "sin" of the century, and himself the main opposition to this one sin, he himself could get away with any sin he pleased.  As the link points out, Pavone was the perfect priest for the Trump era. Trump is so self-important laws have no role in his life. He felt accountable to no one. Women were there to be had. Pavone and Trump are interchangeable.  Pavone was very successful raising money. In his mind, abortion was so important in Catholic beliefs and he was so important in anti-abortion the money he raised opposing it was his to do with what he liked. The Catholic Church, the brand name he used to raise this money, thought the money belonged to it. When he gave the Vatican the bird, it gave him walking papers. With polls showing the majo
Read more