What is Americanized Christianity

I came across an article from 2015 that challenged Christians as to the source of their version of Christianity. While the issues have changed somewhat in the six years since it was written, the thrust of the article remains valid today. 

The U.S. version of Christianity, with a few exceptions, is based on current fetishes of the Republican Party. The fetishes mostly involved moral dislikes of conservative people. 

Back in 2015, the moral world was predicted to collapse is gay marriage became approved. During that period of time denominations were splintering over the issue. The Methodists are still dividing up the spoils of what was once a huge denomination. There was too much religious buffoonery back in 2015. That the Methodist Church is splitting up over gay preachers and gay marriage tells us there it still too much buffoonery. 

Today, the buffoonery is about people who change their gender. People have done this since the beginning of time. All of a sudden, it's the end of the world, a moral travesty. We can predict with certainty this hand wringing over changing genders will pass and Christian buffoonery will jump to something else.

Some of the other ridiculous religious panting is about churches prohibited from gathering because of the pandemic. Today there was a article about some church that was fined $85,000 for continuing to meet in person. The pastor said it was worth the price to continue to hold church services. This is why a growing number in the U.S. think of Christianity as quite strange. 

Christianity was really big in justification of slavery and later segregation. This branch of American Christianity was successful for some 300 years. It has shifted from holding back black people to holding back gay people and women. American Christianity is good at demonizing and casting aside those who otherwise are law abiding productive citizens.

I've been reading about Christianity on the African continent. While the continent is vast and the numbers huge, thus holding much diversity, polls show African Christianity is different than than of the U. S. There is much more belief in invisible demons. Anti Abortion is not as central. I've read a little about Christianity in China. It piggy backs on ancient religions there. 

Christianity is principally about sin. What a sin is, however, can change from one country to the next.

Comments

  1. The result of being non-creedal and non-liturgical

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. helper "The result of being non-creedal and non-liturgical."

      We've been through this many times but it doesn't hurt to review it. The fact is, having a creed and a liturgy does not help. The creeds and liturgies were written by (always) men who had their own axes to grind.

      I looked again at the website of the denomination of my childhood, the Evangelical Covenant Church. I wanted to read its statement of beliefs. Paraphrasing, it said the denomination does not have a lengthy dogma to espouse because there is the Bible. Why replace the Bible with something written by men in suits? This sounds much like the Baptists who (sometimes) say no authority should come between the man/woman and his/her Bible.

      Letting everyone interpret the Bible in their own way leads to the problem Matt often mentions, all kinds of beliefs in every which direction. In the church of my childhood it was all kinds of sins. On the other hand, the (always) men who wrote the dogma of your denomination had their own favorite sins. The men who wrote your denomination's dogma and the guy at the bowling alley who uses the Bible to condemn some group are engaging in an identical form of buffoonery.

      Delete
    2. being creedal and liturgical, (which also includes the lectionary ) prevents the very thing you so abhor in Christianity.
      Your "does not help" just reveals ignorance of the subject

      Delete
  2. helper "being creedal an liturgical prevents the very thing you so abhor in Christianity."

    No it does not. I agree having interpretations and dogma long established and enforced among clergy (not among members of a denomination) keeps beliefs from going off the rails completely. It does not prevent bias and contemporary cultural influences from placing the rails themselves where it favors those those who place them. The rails are arbitrary. That is, the interpretation of an ancient book leaves plenty of latitude for those in power. Your own denomination does not allow women to be preachers. Guess who wrote that rule? It was not women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. re. "No it does not"; I strongly disagree. The problem with your position is that you attribute to dogma things that are not there, and conflate them to all.
      Unfortunately for your argument, Laymen, (and women) have input and participation in all things only minus the sermon from the pulpit during divine service. All sermon content is ALWAYS based upon the lectionary (the three bible readings, in a three year cycle, (The OT, Gospels, and Epistles, Included for the 4th reading from the Psalms.) for the day, based on the church calendar year, (Advent, Christmas, Lent, Easter, etc, and are NOT arbitrary. Never, I repeat NEVER are your pet subjects/ topics included. What you try to include is considered adiaphora. (Things neither commanded or forbidden.) NOT dogma. Feel free to study the complete Pieper or JT Mueller "Christian Dogmatics". You will not find your hot buttons there. Then go to The Book of Concord, you will not find your hot buttons there either. Your claim of women being excluded is false as they participate as full voting members, free to express their opinion, and is nothing more than a straw man dressed as a red herring.

      Delete
  3. In addition; As is required to adhere to the "readings" for sermon CONTENT, (the lectionary), it does not matter who does the sermon, be it man, woman, or chimpanzee.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. helper--I always have a problem with your posts--you talk around in circles. Let's be crystal clear about women behind the pulpit in the Lutheran Missouri Synod denomination. From Wikipedia,

      " The Missouri Synod teaches that the ordination of women as clergy is contrary to scripture."

      That it is your opinion this is unimportant matters not a bit. Nuff said.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe the "Original Sin" Should be Reassigned

The Religious Capitol Invaders May Yet Win

Father Frank Pavone, the Ultimate Crook