Which Makes Us Happier? Knowing the Truth or Believing Fiction is Truth


There are fewer atheists than there are Christians. It's amazing there are any atheists. Christianity, and some other religions, have sales pitches that run circle around atheists.

We all know some religions sell themselves as outsmarting death. They tell us, ""Look, we have this death thing figured out. All you have to do is give yourself to religion and you don't have to die. We guarantee it."

Atheism, however, tells you this is the only life you get. Our competition, religion, can't prove they deliver what they sell you.  We can only offer truth. Most of the time, religion wins. The link makes some interesting (to me) observations on all of this. The author points out the pleasure from learning what one believes is true and verifiable. This makes out one life better because we are not wasting it going down rabbit holes of gods and fake news.

Doubt, reflection and critical thinking should be part of every educated citizen's makeup. Christianity discourages all three. 

I recall one of the huge dictators during my lifetime said the best soldiers were illiterate ones and ones that had no interest in figuring out why things happened or that there might be alternatives. Simply following the dictator's orders was best for the dictator. So it seems in religion. The Catholic Church wants the churches beliefs to be passed down to the faithful from the clergy. They do not want people studying the Bible and figuring it out for themselves. This is the best way to do things. That is, best for the clergy.

The question, then, is this: Are Catholics happier not knowing for certain what the Bible dictates, or, would they be happier figuring that out for themselves. 

As I understand it, the Baptist branch, though it has splintered into many different threads, tells followers the individual shall retain the right to see and understand the Bible for him/her self. This brings up the same question: Are Baptists who learn the truth for themselves happier than Catholics. 

We atheists read the Bible but find no evidence it was inspired by anything of anyone other than those unknown people who wrote it. From our point of view, this is the ultimate truth. Does this make us happier than either the Catholics or the Baptists?

I suppose that since all three believe they know the ultimate truth all three are equally happy. I myself think we humans will survive longer, and be happy we have survived, if we know and believe things that are grounded in fact and are not myths and superstitions. 

Comments

  1. Jon,

    Catholicism and other Christian faiths are conveyed by a rigid hierarchy of obedient clergy, a book of testaments, a compendium of doctrine and dogma, a host of sacramental rituals, a calendar of holy days of obligation, confession and penance, and more. Does all of this intercession make for a second-hand god? As an outsider, sometimes I wonder if the faithful are worshiping the church and not a deity. Perhaps, “We could truly say religion replaced God and God replaced nature, as [they] wandered off the trail of truth and lost [their] way in the forest of faith.” (1)

    (1) https://www.patheos.com/blogs/rationaldoubt/2020/11/nearer-to-wonder-a-response-to-religious-naturalism/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ardy B "...rigid hierarch of obedient clergy..."

      We learned here from our deep Christian posters that every group has pedophiles so it is OK there are some clergy. Unknown sent a post the it was OK for Catholic clergy to have slaves because everyone had them back in the day.

      Yet, the church and its clergy are not supposed to be merely ordinary people with the same weaknesses. They are to give the rest of us "instruction" on morals. In Catholic lore, Peter was given instructions by Jesus himself. The rest of us supposedly are not of that lofty status. I'm not buyin' it.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. Unknown Dec 1, 2020 at 2:57 PM. “are you so stupid” “are you so damn dumb or so malicious”

      Suffice it to say, “I intended to assert only that [some Catholics owned slaves] is a historical fact, like many other historical facts. I was not saying that I approved of it.”

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. tsm Dec 2, 2020 at 2:18 PM. “I presume that you were attempting to give me some ‘advice’.”

      Oh you’re not ready for advice.

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe the "Original Sin" Should be Reassigned

The Religious Capitol Invaders May Yet Win

Father Frank Pavone, the Ultimate Crook