The Naivete of the Religious Right


When religious conservatives demand laws against abortion they are putting their faith in government. The nature of the federal government and of the Presidency has changed in the last several decades and one wonders why religious conservatives have not see the change.                                           

I listened to an interview with the author of On Corruption; What is at Stake. She looked back in the history of the U.S. and found corruption large up to the years of World War I, the depression and World War II. Prior to that series of events corruption was largely in the open and attention drawn to it was scoffed at by those on the take. It was "Sure I'm doing it. Try to stop me."

The trauma of the depression followed by war time patriotism took away, largely, the notion politicians could take bribes and steal with impunity. Profiting from the Presidency was absent during the years of Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower and others into the 1980's. The link author makes the case the savings and loan crisis was evidence things had changed. 

Ratcheting down banking regulations ratcheted up opportunities for wrong doing. While this was not so much tied directly to bribe and direct profiting by public official it was permission given by government to take money from people without being held accountable. By allowing home mortgages to be packaged into securities much like stocks and bonds the transparency of where they came from went dark. A form of corruption was present.

Today there is a steady diet of those in Congress buying or selling stocks based on unannounced events or legislation. The practice of "blind trusts" seems to have evaporated. The current President requires federal employees and countries that curry favor with the U.S. government to buy rooms at his hotels.

If corruption is not turned back we can expect it to continue, maybe even get worse. Does the religious right think the government it is trying to capture will more more honest than the one that exists? Does it think it can get its way without paying to play? 

The religious right would serve its own purpose by joining those it opposes in cleaning up the corruption that is present.  


Comments

  1. Jon, “one wonders why religious conservatives have not seen the change”

    Maybe they haven’t seen the change because they’re too close to the action. Judging by some of the caucuses in Congress they are the action. The way some denominations lobby and peddle influence in politics one wonders what the essential property of Christian identity is anymore.

    I am quite certain a united front against corruption cannot be mustered with the current White House in power. Their go to tactic is to divide and conquer the selected enemy. But the American people are not the enemy. Misapplied division divides advantage on the side of justice and good works. In the current celebration of corruption malicious division works well with distract, deflect, distrust, deny, delude, and defraud. Cha-Ching!, declare the people engaged in dishonest and fraudulent business dealings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ardy B "too close to the action."

      That may be why they cannot see the corruption already hitting them or soon to arrive. When they have to pay-to-play they will find out it's not cheap. They would benefit as much as anyone with honest government.

      Delete
  2. hope that you two gobblers enjoy strutting and gobbling in the dung heaps in the leftist barn yard

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown — “dung”

      What is the essential property of Christian identity (not Christian Identity) in today’s America?

      Delete
  3. Unknown-- "hope you two gobblers enjoy strutting..."

    You sound like you are feeling better. :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. no, I'm not. just expressing my pique.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe the "Original Sin" Should be Reassigned

The Religious Capitol Invaders May Yet Win

Father Frank Pavone, the Ultimate Crook