What If There Had Been no Paul in the Bible



We all know lots of the New Testament writing is attributed to Paul. Thus, Christianity is supposed to be about Christ but those in the faith buy this Paul guy completely.

There is so many in the faith vacating its denominations today. A good portion of these people latch onto an emerging part of the faith that focuses only on Jesus. That is, it focuses on what people want to believe Jesus was about. Is abandons most of the Bible. Or, as advocates say, frees Christianity from the Bible.

One of the figures in this change lays out what the new Christianity advocates. This author, Ken Giles published a popular book with the controversial title, Jesus Unbound; Liberating the Word of God from the Bible.

From a review, I gathered the theology of this movement is that Jesus does not judge people but accepts them as they are. It's a Jesus who mixes with the poor and unwashed and does not hate his enemies. Certainly there are places in the Bible that claim this. Then, there are places where Jesus seems like a cranky self centered person we would not like if we knew him. He killed a fig tree when is did not have the figs he wanted.

These inconsistencies surrounding what may well be a fictional character, Jesus, are the logical outcome of different writers in different countries many years apart writing about someone they had never met years after he was supposed to have been alive. Nevertheless, focuses on the parts of Jesus people like and not on the writing of Paul makes for a more modern and appealing religion.

The Christian faith would do well to ignore the parts of the Bible that are clearly about matters of the ancient world and focus on interpretations that appeal to people today. If current denominations do not do this the public will make up new denominations.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe the "Original Sin" Should be Reassigned

The Religious Capitol Invaders May Yet Win

Father Frank Pavone, the Ultimate Crook