The Complex Belief in the Ressurection


I encountered a debate within the faith about the faith itself. It is about whether one group in the faith really believes in the resurrection as much as the other. Ironically, the "most sincere" of the two, claiming to be most certain as to the point of the resurrection, is the most liberal politically.

The author calls much of current Christianity the "dead orthodoxy." He calls it that because while he believes the life given people is to be one where people "give themselves fully to the work of the Lord" as preached in 1 Cor. 15:58. The resurrection did not happen, he writes, simply for lives that pursue selfish profit or to hammer on gay people and women. It is a life of looking after others and giving of oneself.

Of course this "living like Jesus" thingy is regarded with contempt by most of Christianity. The dead orthodoxy is a cross about sin, not doing good works. If the faith talks about topics other than condemning the sin of others, what's the fun in that?

So, is the tale about Jesus coming back to life implying others get a pass on death to illustrate how much sin followers commit and how important is is to get those sins wiped off the records of sin or is it about being given life to serve human kind? The faith is popular because each person can believe  whatever he/she wants.

The surprising thing is that anyone debates what the resurrection means because so far as we know never happened.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe the "Original Sin" Should be Reassigned

The Religious Capitol Invaders May Yet Win

Father Frank Pavone, the Ultimate Crook