Was "The God Delusion" Wrong
We're now a couple of decades past the best seller by Richard Dawkins. Its sales have fallen, new writers emerged and time has gone on. Now it is popular to claim Dawkins has been defeated. That is, conservative pundits, making a living selling to conservative readers, are claiming the existence of an invisible super-natural force is not a delusion but backed by science-based information. One can see a pattern in the critics of Dawson. It is the same pattern that we have seen of evolution since day one. Someone, usually only one, person with science credentials will write somewhere the creation including humans is too complex to have happened without a "designer" or "creator." Usually the critic has some way to justify the amount of time it would take for something like fish becoming bird or the human hand to develop and decide it could not have happened by evolution. There wasn't enough time, it the bogus theory. Then there are comments made by prominent...